Sad facial change mitigated by pretty toes
Aug. 5th, 2005 08:46 amI have a "Job" Interview this morning with an Interpreter refferal agency here in Portland. Seeing as I don't have an RID Certification (Becuase I have political objections to the organization, and, well... Cuz I am lazy.), they want to meet with me in person. I am looking forward to that, as talking to the woman on the phone was lots of fun. Thing is, I was not really prepared on this trip for a formal interview, so I had to go buy some dress up clothes and shoes. The real tradgedy was that I had to trim the goatee... It was just a bit on the wild side for an interview... I Don't think it looks bad exactly, it's just that I was working on growing it out... Oh well...

So that was kind of sad.. BUT.. LAst night, I re-did the toes.. Silver with TINY LITTLE GREEN GLITTER over them.

So that was kind of sad.. BUT.. LAst night, I re-did the toes.. Silver with TINY LITTLE GREEN GLITTER over them.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 04:45 pm (UTC)And the toes are fabulous! (Maybe I'm a freak, but I'm jealous of your furriness ;-) I'll have to look into glitter myself; it seems so fantastically whimsical.
JOhn.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 05:06 pm (UTC)Ok so, i give up; what the hell is that yellow thing in the background of your head photo? A long shoehorn? a beatin' cane? flypaper? what?!
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 05:13 pm (UTC)And I am sending positive interview energy your way.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 06:53 pm (UTC)More facial hair than I'll know in a lifetime!
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 07:26 pm (UTC):0)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 03:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 05:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 08:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 08:23 am (UTC)1) RID is striving to be a monopoly, and that is never a good thing.
2) I don't understand who gets certified and who does not. Some of the best interpreters I know have failed the performance test and some of the RID interpreters I have teamed with have no business being interpreters. It is interesting to me that many of the interpreters that I know who are fabulous, yet failed, look different (Read: Non-white). This is only something I have observed and I am in NO WAY accusing ANYONE of racism. Yet, there is no accountability and reasons for failing are never given. What's up with that?
3) The 2-d video model for the test is NOT a test of interpreting skills in the real world. IRL, interpreting is a dynamic process where visual cues are picked up and recieved from both the client and the interpreter (sometimes subconsciously) and modes, styles, sign choices, ect.. are adjusted accordingly. I feel that evaluating skill in this way encourages a rigid mode of interpreting that does not serve the client, especially clients with lower language skills.
You asked.. and these are only my opinions, and they were formed many years ago. Things may have changed. And also, I need to adjust my attitude since I am no longer going to have a choice of certificating and am going to be forced to join RID. WHY OH WHY did I allow my NAD Cert to lapse???
no subject
Date: 2005-08-06 11:12 am (UTC)"Little Rock on the Willamette"